Friday, December 2, 2011

Who Wrote the Bible?

Who wrote the Bible?  When was it written?  Why was it written?

These are topics which one almost never hears discussed on the pulpit, and yet are topics which are of utmost - if potentially controversial - importance to the reading and understanding of the Bible.  A search of the Internet reveals as many answers as one can formulate questions, some of which are quite self-serving.  For example, someone offers the opinion that the Bible was written so "that we might believe in the name of God," and goes on to quote 1 John 5:13.  John was one of Jesus' disciples.  The Bible, in fact, spans a much longer period than simply Jesus's life and teachings, and therein lies the rub.  Some scholars have traced some biblical entries as far back as 3500 years ago.  And "entries" is loosely termed as writings.  Most folks were illiterate in those days, and what we now hold as Holy Writ is a collection of writings from various sources that were accumulated over many centuries, from word of mouth, from songs, as well as from some fertile imaginations.

Moreover, the Bible was not compiled in English.  The King James Version is arguably a modern version, and even more user-friendly versions crop up all the time.  The thing to remember here is that, just as in the children's game of chain, stories that have been passed down through the generations manage to change in character and flavor; and stories that were written in a foreign language do not translate directly into another language, in this case, English.  Still, it might be argued that the Bible is the Word of God, written without error in any respect.  Many Christians consider the text of the Bible to be divinely inspired, and therefore taken on faith.

If that is the case, then no intellectual analysis can be conducted.  Indeed, no "explanations" can be offered from the pulpit or anywhere else, for that matter.  There can be no interpretation of the stories, just a blind acceptance of the holy writings.  It is, in fact, the position of fundamentalist religions that the Bible as a repository for the Word of God, cannot be understood, should not be understood, and is not open to any interpretation, save an acceptance on faith of what is written.  The fact that what is written is written in modern English should not pose a problem; nor should the illogic of some of the stories (that Methuselah lived 900 years, for example).

Therefore I say to you, if after examination and due diligence, the Bible in all its mysteries still holds sway, and you feel secure in God's protection with your faith unshaken, then lift up your voice on high, and shout Hallelujah, for yours is truly a chosen life.

Thursday, December 1, 2011

The 5000-Year War

Sixty-three years ago, after 5000 years of bloodshed, something remarkable happened.  The United Nations voted into independent statehood a tiny piece of land no larger than New Jersey.  That land was Israel.

The land that is now Israel has been a source of contention since the beginning of recorded time.  Nations from the Philistines to Alexander the Great, from Rome to the British Empire, even to Hitler have vied to own it.  In a Q&A session recently, someone suggested a reason for such acrimony: religion.  But "religion" was not a source of contention long ago.  In biblical times, there was monotheism - the worship of one deity - and paganism, or the worship of many deities, as the Egyptians had done. 

More later...

 

Saturday, September 3, 2011

How do sins and virtues apply to contemporary times?

The list of sins and virtues were cannonized by Pope Gregory 1st in the Sixth Century.  Concepts such as gluttony, sloth and pride seem very remote from today's mores.  Let's explore how they are still relevant.

Friday, June 17, 2011

We are a social creature

Discuss the biology of our species, the infant's depce as compared to other creatures.  Despite our ostensible isolation, our self-made cocoons of air conditioning and flat-screen TVs, we still congregate for celebrations, we congregate to worship in a place that we consecrated to our chosen Higher Power, etc.  Therefore, much as we behave as if the concept of sin may be outdated, the purpose of the list is to serve as a code of conduct which is never outdated.  Relate to current day.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

The Seven and Seven



The Seven Deadly Sins and the Four Last Things...

This is a treatise on values -- both good and bad -- that are outlined and spoken of in the pages of the Bible, some of which have made their way into our modern life.  I refer here to the Seven Deadly Sins and the Seven Heavenly Virtues.

There is a combination of Cardinal and Theological virtues derived initially from Plato's scheme, Protagoras and adapted by St. Ambrose, Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas. The term "cardinal" comes from the Latin "cardo" or hinge; the cardinal virtues are so called because they are hinges upon which the door of moral life swings. The theological virtues are so named because the object of these virtues is the divine being (theos).

The theological Seven Deadly Sins are: Lust, Gluttony, Greed, Sloth, Wrath, Envy and Pride.

Opposing the Seven Deadly Sins are the Seven Heavenly Virtues: Chastity, Temperance, Charity, Diligence, Patience, Kindness, Humility.

The keystone of the Virtues is restraint.

Let's look at the theological Virtues and their counterpart, the Deadly Sins:

Chastity-Lust:  Chastity suggests restraint in matters of the flesh.  Embracing of moral wholesomeness and achieving purity of thought and deed.  It might be said that lust is base, and does not
glorify God's intent that joining of man and woman be for the purpose of procreation.

Temperance-Gluttony:  Constant mindfulness of others and one's surroundings; practicing self-control, abstention, and moderationIn the act of gluttony, we give up control and mindfulness in favor of self-indulgence and pleasure-seeking.  Remember that at the time this was written, food was not plentiful as it is now.  It might be argued that gluttony is all the more abhorrent today, when food is so easily available.

Charity-Greed:  Selflessness.  Willingness to give and help.  A selflessness of thought or actions.  This harkens back to the days when the harvesters would leave some crop in the fields for the poor to glean.  Clearly, its opposite, greed, is a lack of giving, an avarice that compels one to hoard, and cast a disparaging eye at the beggar.

Diligence-Sloth:  An industrious attitude in one's actions and work. Decisive work ethic. Budgeting one's time; eschew laziness. Throwing oneself into a project with enthusiasm.  Sloth is laziness, and
unwillingness to engage, or engaging grudgingly, dragging one's heels.

Patience-Wrath:  Forbearance and patience with yourself and your fellowman.  Resolving conflicts peacefully, as opposed to resorting to conflict or force to gain your objective.  The ability to forgive; to show mercy.  In modern parlence, don't hold a grudge.  Be generous in understanding the other person's point of view.  Do not allow your way of doing things to dominate a situation.  Wrath speaks of deep anger, a sense of violence and harm toward another.

Kindness-Envy:  Accept another's good fortune happily, and do not compare yourself.  Realize that you have had your own good fortune in many situations.  Envy simply is not relevant.  Discard it.  Do not nurture it, because it is not a truth.  It denies all the blessings that you do have.  Kindness also invokes elements of temperance.

Humility-Pride:  Modest behavior, giving credit where credit is due; not unfairly glorifying one's own self.  Do not boast, do not set yourself apart and above your fellowman.  Do not assume that yours is the correct opinion.  Make space for the other person.